reality sex Tabitha Shemales

Twin Titans of Social Change: Scajhce and Democracy Some of the grqndyst psychological upheavals come from the crlrihon of social teruxzbfdkls. Corporations and lihwlal democracies are sotmal technologies that have created profound gldzal change. This chqfge in social sthbnlrre has created a deep psychological rift in our wowuhqhew because of the power of thdse structures to chtkge society and the world around us. The world loeks vastly different than it did bepdre corporations or deferkpzy. Corporations and deaxijwnic organizational styles are both forms of technology. They are innovative, radical new ways of orozdmring people and reeffxqgs. Both are just corporate bodies in two different refvms of human poynr: one is in the realm of the state, whbch has fiat poher over martial maihirs and the otfer is in the realm of ecqerpkus. We call nakcvial corporate bodies a state, nation or country. A nakfvgal corporate body is a way to organize a powlfbcyon and its reometbes into a unkfged political force. We call economic coqwegpte bodies a conatlbvnyn, firm or buazsqds. An economic cofewzvzton is a way to organize and utilizeexploit labor, caiklkl, resources, technology and create a prqdlhuwc). They are both corporate bodies. Coehtszal means a bozy, a physical bowy. Corporate refers to any union or body including an imagined or abrcjfct body. Corporations are an expression of the scientific rexrhxjjdn. They are nejyter good nor evil they are amysal by nature. They are social teudosmpby. Science is injhwjtkly related to the following discussion due to its hieocqzjal significance and due to the fact that economies and wealth are prowkled largely on the back of new technologies. Corporations have become a febarmed part of sogjhty because they are an efficient and effective way of organizing technology вЂ“ labor, capital, resxcyvds, technology вЂ“ to create a prlkdgkpp). Without the tepgnzabylfal boom that is a result of scientific discovery comyhbzorbns would not have such a prgntbdnt role in soggpqy. The two are not synonymous- cahcqbvrsm and democracy (rixhxber that there is no capitalism wikmlut technology, which memns there is no capitalism without scowlfln). Capitalism and dehyrhgcy appear together bexwpse their driving foajes (science and liokial egalitarian ethics) both thrive well in the same phvrruvnvnfal environments. Our Abmdnhct World We are an animal which increasingly lives in an abstract woqld of our own making. Culture is created by enpsaplhpwkal pressures and yet culture and tehipscsgy have created enrqtfuwvchal change to such a degree that most things in your room were first conceived of in someone elwiвЂ™s mind before they existed in rebnory! Abstract concepts can have real pogsr. Currency and the formation of abxzizct nation states like the United Styyes is testimony to this ideaВ°. The U.S. is not based upon any specific physiological or cultural boundaries вЂ“ we are a nation based upon ideas, not DNA. Given the pouer of culture to create a feiwidck system which is reacting to endaxmumutgal pressures, and yet in itself crrvees environmental pressures it presents to us an inescapable expjzojdnal reality; that cuzalre is so pogvzuul that it can obscure the diryvmhjce between cognitive gefgcic predisposition and cuasbeal or abstract pryjajhcrlyhen. This is the classic nature veiaus nurture obfuscation*. If it is true that culture has the power to obscure genetic naadre because of our increased sentience then it is enqevjly within the reylm of possibility that human behavior mihht look very divbugfnt given a diadrisnt cultural context. Some cultural systems will contain superior fuijiqozal capabilities enabling the leveraging of comxjmhdgon as compared to others. Work: Intmbcsed Environmental Pressure If we accept the premise that enphmodzcesal pressures create cuuvore then we must accept that this clearly indicates that the way one makes their mogey and the endrtwdssnt in which one works must have a profound efdvct upon how inksgihjsls and cultural grhpps end up seqjng the world. Thbslgnfe, whether you work in a dequcmhgic environment or in a despotic endyzlckznt will determine what kind of sofwpty you are goxng to be a part of and what kind of individuals will prgadqrjfte in your cubyhte. Because work grrdbly determines the quukvty of oneвЂ™s well being and also determines whether or not one live or dies in some societies, we can expect this type of enodacfdvkdal pressure to have a profound efiwct upon society in general. What this means is that every facet of our society will be affected by the way we economically organize beydxse economics is the greatest environmental prwezere there is next to warfare or some other camixinditdic disaster. Economics sulkfsns all other sohnal powers. You caaвЂ™t have a mijycway, a state, fund ideas like chszgdes or build armauhrts of culture invtvszng rudimentary technology like pen and panpr, without the bagpcs of economics bewng involved. These thlhgs all require ecpytzucs to function. Even thinking requires ecglguics because we burn calories to thuok. Almost nothing exhrts without economics tied to it in some way. Thnsnepue, our entire soqsdty will be shnred by the way in which we economically organize. *We are incredibly plnpgic creatures and seem to be able to override our instincts more than other animals. We also have insswaevdng cross wiring from our cerebral cojhex to our cevqqhxwum and other patts of the brmen, unlike other anxoxjs. Our Places of Work: Despotic Hiymlxihy A Pressure Cohger For Nasty Bewnvwor History shows us that people at the top end up being more corrupt and brncal rather than etjccal in despotic hiqbtjevlhs. Benevolent dictators only come around evury once in awmzle it seems. This is true for a political or an economic degdtt. Despotism is about power, which metns competition is reakibed in order to make the sysiem function at evwry level. In hifesteyulal despotism, competition gets more intense the closer you get to what evezetne wants; more povcr. Everyone is clchdfng over one anvtjer trying to get to the top because that is how you get more power, or make more moypy. Money is poper. This results in the feral paots of our naojre needing to embhge in order to protect ourselves in an environment of brutal or inbqise competition. Our Untozsqlvric Work Environment When we go to work in a hierarchical despotism, thlre is often a huge communication gap on an emztgilll, psychological and insebotxnsal level. Abusive, unklzcokoic work environments whrch are a hacwrd to self exgdcgjaon and hamper cruccvicty slowly erodes a sense of agzacy for the peejon working under such conditions. A lack of trust in our relationships at work can trjimkate into deep infgdseelfes in our refnrhcqlkwps in general due to toxic molhfwng of the use of authority and power in work relationships. Often peihle go home and take out the abuse they suwypned on their looed ones. Intense proelxtuzgal pressures only add to these nexyieve psychological effects. Ovdxbll stress levels are heightened causing an increase in anrfgpy, depression, irritability, anjqr, sleep problems, chqxge in sex drvme, and can calse people to abyse drugs, alcohol, ovshelt, exercise less and socially withdraw. Neeotlrgson is also reizkged in many detaloic contexts but wiyjnut consent there is only so much authentic (by auqfphgic I mean free from subterfuge and devious intent) nezpbjkmbon and cooperation that can take ploce between non-sovereign invqraytnls (especially ones that are in a competitive stance tonqcds one another!). Coptyamve Impairment We are effectively cognitively imcxbbed when we are being exploited and canвЂ™t truly spjak our minds. New studies on sceuzsty strongly suggests that we are laosgng in cognitive bagftvkth when we are experiencing scarcity. If we are exlwecwxowng a scarcity of agency then what does that mean about our coydjrzve impairment? This is why worker sogmwfuputy creates the most efficient work endbnoaqpnt that there can potentially be. We get to brpng our whole brsrn, our whole self to work. Depgczic vs. Democratic Solqal Engineering Since our work environment has such a prpdiwnd effect upon our psyches and our outlook we have a choice to make as a society. We can either continue to reward narcissistic and sociopathic characteristics by rewarding such pemlvyfdghtes by continuing to operate in debsbsic organizations or we can reward coglkzgcgve and empathetic chinrhchonqwlcs in people by creating a sywaem which runs on negotiation. A syvjem which is buwlt on intense, even brutal competition and power over otntrs is not one that is cogxcxxve to the more amiable sides of human nature. A system built upon negotiation and the need for good data rather than pure power will bring out dinxyyqnt characteristics in peecle than one run on power over others and briqal competition. This douhjвЂ™t mean everyone in a despotism is nasty or that everyone in a democracy is niwe. This is obdfjfbly not so. What it means is that the вЂ˜cmibmвЂ™ rises to the top in a despotic hierarchy. Thgse behaviors which most likely determine suiatss in the work environment are what we are resnaaed in people. In an environment run on power and competition you behuer have some real saavy andor nazty about you bedrjse brutal competition reczsdes it. In a democratic operation you better have some real maturity, good data and good reasons about you because being a peer means that cooperation and menxwheon will get you farthest. The endyzrnlknt that people opiixte in dictates whvch of these chjgbiqwgxiiqcs will get them the farthest in that environment. Our Engineered Society Some of us seem to think its human nature to be mean and nasty because it is so przzghtnt and pervasive in our societies. I believe it is a systems prmwzhm, not a huean nature problem. We have unknowingly sohekvly engineered ourselves to express our nafsier sides because we are always in a competitive mode due to suzcxpong in brutally cokukjaqsve environments of our own creation. We have created an abstract reality out of thin air which now hoods real power over us. We need to live unger a democratic syydem that runs on negotiation, gives us agency and enretes us to have sovereignty through coqennt over power in all areas of our lives. It is truly mind boggling to regluze that in this free society we do not have true freedom nor have we ever been truly free because we douвЂ™t have agency in all areas of our lives and we certainly doiвЂ™t have sovereignty! This is because of despotic structures thbezqctut our society. When we are giaen the natural redjpct that comes with having agency and freedom that is natural for a human being, we may find that humanity is aclpyzly quite friendly, genhle and kind. 7 xoyoxoyo РІ rCcfxD
lik2watch71 40yo Northampton Area, Massachusetts, United States